AdvertiseDonate
Latest1,600 tons of pumpkins rescued from landfills
World Media Now · 171 N Aberdeen St, Suite 400, Chicago, IL 60607

US Prosecutors Charge Two Ex-FBI Officials With Perjury Over Hunter Biden Laptop

The Department of Justice alleges Nikki Floris and Bradley Benavides concealed their roles in the 2023 congressional testimony regarding the laptop investigation.

By Kavya Robinson ·

Illustration for: US Prosecutors Charge Two Ex-FBI Officials With Perjury Over Hunter Biden Laptop
Illustration generated for this article, not a news photograph.

The United States Justice Department has filed criminal charges against two former senior FBI officials, alleging they provided false information to lawmakers regarding the bureau’s handling of the Hunter Biden laptop investigation. The announcement came on Friday, marking the first criminal prosecution of former FBI executives in connection with the inquiry into the son of former President Joe Biden.

Prosecutors named Nikki Floris, a former analyst who led the intelligence division in the FBI’s Washington field office, and Bradley Benavides, a former deputy assistant director for counterintelligence. The indictment charges both with intentionally concealing key facts while testifying before the House Judiciary Committee in 2023. If convicted, each defendant faces a maximum prison sentence of five years. Following a brief appearance before a federal magistrate judge on Friday, the pair was released.

US Attorney Jeanine Pirro, whose office is leading the prosecution, stated that the officials undermined the institutions they swore to uphold. She described the act of lying to Congress as a strike at the heart of the democratic system. Pirro added that when senior agents believe they are above the law, it is time to bring the hammer of justice down on them.

An FBI affidavit details the alleged discrepancies in Floris’s testimony. The document states that Floris repeatedly denied involvement in the Hunter Biden investigations. However, prosecutors say she maintained frequent communication with the case team for over a year, exchanging information about the subject. The affidavit further alleges that she testified to having no knowledge of the laptop, despite coordinating the FBI’s real-time response to news coverage of the device.

Benavides testified before the same committee several months after Floris. He told lawmakers he knew little about the matter, claiming he learned about the laptop from a Wikipedia entry while preparing for his session. The affidavit contradicts this account, stating that Benavides was in constant communication about the laptop over a period of days. A committee member noted that these answers influenced the investigation by thwarting follow-up interviews and subpoenas.

Defense attorneys for both officials challenged the timing and basis of the charges. Floris’s lawyers argued the government relied on the say-so of politicians rather than facts. They characterized Floris as a patriot who served as an FBI intelligence officer for nearly 20 years. The legal team stated it was no coincidence that the government filed these charges years later, on the eve of an election. Ron Safer, Benavides’s attorney, urged the court to hold a hearing on whether prosecutors possessed sufficient evidence against two lifetime public servants.

US Magistrate Judge Zia M. Faruqui expressed concern over the timing, noting that the charges were filed more than three years after the original testimony. He asked whether the alleged false statements had a material impact on the legislative investigation. Faruqui granted the defense’s request for an evidentiary hearing, setting it for Tuesday. He described this timeline as rare for defendants who have been released from custody.

Faruqui remarked that the information appeared quite old and that both defendants had sparkling backgrounds in law enforcement. He noted they had an interest in clearing their names quickly, describing a Sword of Damocles hanging over their heads that would follow them for the rest of their lives.

The laptop at the center of the legal dispute was handed to the FBI in 2019. A computer shop owner told the Washington Post that Hunter Biden had dropped off the device and never returned to collect it. The owner said he turned it over to authorities after viewing some of its contents. The device has remained a partisan flashpoint, with Republicans citing it as evidence of corruption and Democrats describing it as part of a conspiracy.

The case arrives at a moment when many FBI agents have been pushed out of the bureau since the start of President Donald Trump’s second term. Allies of the President accused these agents of working against him. Some dismissed agents said they were let go for working on investigations involving Trump, while others cited a lack of loyalty as the reason for their departure.

Source: The Jerusalem Post

More News · World news · Report a business · Got a Story?

Get World Media Now in your inboxCulture, cities and the news in between. Free, a few times a week, unsubscribe any time.

Related stories

Get World Media Now in your inboxCulture, cities and the news in between. Free, a few times a week, unsubscribe any time.